The farcical non-factual news continues with White House press secretary Josh Earnest "rejects in any way that the US would create any false flag operation" and proclaims that "consensus" views and "unanimous obvious facts" are that Trump called on Russia to hack Clinton...
Why Russia Was Not The Source of the Emails
http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/12/heres-why-russia-wasnt-behind-the-wikileaks-emails-leak/
The post Why Russia Was Not The Source of the Emails appeared first on PaulCraigRoberts.org.
In our initial take on the Washington Post's story about the "secret" CIA assessment that Russia helped Trump win the election (since contested by the FBI), we said that this may amount to nothing short of a "soft coup" attempt by leaders in the US Intel community and the Obama administration, and warned to expect of a push by prominent democrats to pressure the electoral college to "take into consideration" these findings next Monday, on December 19, when the formal vote for president is set to take place.
This is how we summarized the newly-formed narrative:
Top Experts Dismiss Reported Claim That Russia Influenced the US Election
Presstitutes such as the New York Times and Reuters continue to hype an alleged CIA finding that Russians hacked Hillary’s emails and used them to influence the election outcome. As a number of experts have noted, there is no evidence whatsoever for the claim, which is in the category of fake news.
Julian Assange at Wikileaks, which released the leaked, not hacked, documents, denies that the Russians were involved.
Authored by Craig Murray,
I have watched incredulous as the CIA’s blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story – blatant because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it. There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption. Yes this rubbish has been the lead today in the Washington Post in the US and the Guardian here, and was the lead item on the BBC main news. I suspect it is leading the American broadcasts also.