You are here

Mapped: Economies Most Dependent on Remittances

Mapped: Economies Most Dependent on Remittances

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Tajikistan is the world’s most remittance-dependent economy, with inflows equal to 47.9% of GDP in 2024.
  • Several smaller economies rely on remittances for a quarter or more of GDP, including Nicaragua, Nepal, Honduras, and Samoa.
  • By comparison, the global average is just 0.82%, showing how concentrated remittance dependence is.

In some economies, money sent home by workers abroad is not just helpful—it is a major pillar of national income. In Tajikistan, remittances were equal to 47.9% of GDP in 2024, the highest share in the world.

The visualization, created by Iswardi Ishak using World Bank data, maps personal remittances received as a share of GDP across 194 economies in 2024. It shows how migration-linked income plays an outsized role in a small group of countries, compared with a global average of just 0.82%.

Ranked: Where Remittances Make Up the Biggest Share

Tajikistan ranks far above every other economy, with remittances equal to 47.9% in 2024.

Nicaragua, Nepal, Honduras, and Samoa also stand out, each relying on these inflows for roughly a quarter of national output. Globally, the average is just 0.82%.

Rank Country Remittances as a % of GDP (2024)
1 Tajikistan 47.89
2 Lebanon 33.35
3 Nicaragua 26.64
4 Nepal 26.23
5 Honduras 25.70
6 Bermuda 25.41
7 Samoa 24.01
8 El Salvador 24.00
9 Gambia, The 22.00
10 Liberia 21.28
11 Lesotho 20.94
12 Comoros 19.60
13 Guatemala 19.12
14 Kyrgyz Republic 17.74
15 Somalia, Fed. Rep. 17.70
16 Kosovo 17.30
17 Haiti 16.30
18 Jamaica 16.19
19 Uzbekistan 14.42
20 Cabo Verde 12.25
21 Georgia 11.87
22 Marshall Islands 11.87
23 Timor-Leste 11.77
24 Senegal 11.43
25 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10.55
26 Moldova 10.54
27 Montenegro 10.34
28 Guinea-Bissau 9.79
29 Sao Tome and Principe 9.75
30 Pakistan 9.40
31 French Polynesia 9.20
32 Dominican Republic 9.05
33 Philippines 8.73
34 Zimbabwe 8.45
35 Nigeria 8.44
36 Albania 8.41
37 Jordan 8.31
38 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 7.94
39 Morocco 7.79
40 Burundi 7.69
41 Egypt, Arab Rep. 7.60
42 New Caledonia 7.26
43 Croatia 7.21
44 Fiji 7.11
45 Sri Lanka 6.79
46 Serbia 6.40
47 Tunisia 6.34
48 Ukraine 6.29
49 Bangladesh 6.11
50 Cambodia 6.10
51 Solomon Islands 6.01
52 Dominica 5.67
53 West Bank and Gaza 5.37
54 Ecuador 5.25
55 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 4.95
56 Armenia 4.92
57 Belize 4.81
58 Ethiopia 4.77
59 Kiribati 4.76
60 Sierra Leone 4.60
61 Kenya 4.15
62 Mali 3.99
63 Ghana 3.68
64 Mexico 3.64
65 Rwanda 3.63
66 Suriname 3.63
67 India 3.52
68 Grenada 3.50
69 St. Kitts and Nevis 3.45
70 Vietnam 3.36
71 Niger 3.27
72 Curacao 3.26
73 Latvia 3.06
74 Colombia 2.83
75 Congo, Dem. Rep. 2.82
76 North Macedonia 2.70
77 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 2.69
78 Luxembourg 2.68
79 Uganda 2.65
80 Paraguay 2.56
81 Burkina Faso 2.55
82 Romania 2.49
83 Guinea 2.46
84 Hungary 2.46
85 Guyana 2.43
86 St. Lucia 2.38
87 Bolivia 2.34
88 Bulgaria 2.33
89 Madagascar 2.33
90 Belgium 2.31
91 Mongolia 2.22
92 Slovakia 2.10
93 Cote d'Ivoire 2.03
94 Mauritius 1.92
95 Azerbaijan 1.82
96 Belarus 1.81
97 Sudan 1.81
98 Cyprus 1.80
99 Thailand 1.80
100 Peru 1.71
101 Malawi 1.65
102 Myanmar 1.55
103 Lao PDR 1.49
104 Tanzania 1.42
105 Nauru 1.37
106 Djibouti 1.35
107 Zambia 1.32
108 Andorra 1.30
109 Cameroon 1.29
110 Lithuania 1.24
111 Slovenia 1.24
112 France 1.23
113 Czechia 1.22
114 Antigua and Barbuda 1.19
115 Mozambique 1.17
116 Estonia 1.15
117 Indonesia 1.15
118 Barbados 1.14
119 Benin 1.10
120 Poland 0.95
121 Aruba 0.89
122 Mauritania 0.87
123 European Union 0.81
124 Trinidad and Tobago 0.78
125 Costa Rica 0.76
126 Iceland 0.74
127 Sweden 0.73
128 Namibia 0.72
129 Eswatini 0.69
130 Algeria 0.67
131 Botswana 0.66
132 Qatar 0.66
133 Austria 0.65
134 Panama 0.61
135 Portugal 0.59
136 Seychelles 0.55
137 Italy 0.47
138 Germany 0.45
139 Bahamas, The 0.42
140 Korea, Rep. 0.40
141 Switzerland 0.39
142 Netherlands 0.39
143 Malaysia 0.38
144 Spain 0.37
145 Denmark 0.36
146 United Arab Emirates 0.33
147 Congo, Rep. 0.28
148 Macao SAR 0.27
149 Finland 0.25
150 Iraq 0.25
151 New Zealand 0.23
152 Brazil 0.22
153 Greece 0.22
154 South Africa 0.21
155 Norway 0.20
156 Israel 0.18
157 China 0.17
158 Uruguay 0.17
159 Argentina 0.16
160 United Kingdom 0.13
161 Japan 0.12
162 Hong Kong SAR 0.11
163 Ireland 0.11
164 Australia 0.10
165 Russian Federation 0.09
166 Kazakhstan 0.08
167 Maldives 0.08
168 Turkiye 0.07
169 Malta 0.06
170 Angola 0.05
171 Canada 0.04
172 Oman 0.04
173 Chile 0.03
174 Saudi Arabia 0.03
175 United States 0.03
176 Kuwait 0.01
177 Papua New Guinea 0.01
-- Togo 8.69 (2020)
-- Tonga 42.61 (2023)
-- Tuvalu 4.16 (2023)
-- Bhutan 3.58 (2023)
-- Syrian Arab Republic 2.64 (2010)
-- Vanuatu 18.75 (2022)
-- Yemen, Rep. 15.89 (2018)
-- Afghanistan 1.87 (2023)
-- San Marino 1.10 (2023)
-- Palau 0.80 (2023)
-- Turks and Caicos Islands 0.57 (2018)
-- Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.55 (2004)
-- Venezuela, RB 0.25 (2016)
-- Cayman Islands 0.15 (2023)
-- Gabon 0.13 (2015)
-- Libya 0.03 (2006)
-- Iran, Islamic Rep. No Data
-- World 0.82

Why Some Economies Depend More on Remittances

Remittance dependence is highest in smaller or lower-income economies where a significant share of the workforce migrates abroad. The money sent home supports household spending, education, housing, and basic consumption, giving remittances an outsized role in the domestic economy.

This reliance can be a double-edged sword. While remittances are often more stable than foreign investment during downturns, countries that depend on them are more exposed to changes in host-country labor markets, migration policy, and transfer costs.

Big Economies, Smaller Shares

Interestingly, some of the world’s largest recipients of remittances, like India, Mexico, and the Philippines, do not rank as highly when measured as a share of GDP. For example:

  • India receives massive inflows in absolute terms but remittances account for just 3.5% of GDP.
  • Mexico sees a similar pattern, with 3.6% of GDP tied to remittances.
  • The Philippines stands higher at 8.7%, reflecting a more migration-driven economy.

Simply put: large economies have more diversified sources of income, diluting the relative impact of remittances.

The Cost of Sending Money Home

Despite their importance, remittances can come with high transaction costs. In fact, some countries face the highest remittance fees globally, reducing the amount families ultimately receive.

Lowering these costs remains a key goal for policymakers and international organizations, as even small reductions can significantly boost household income in remittance-dependent nations.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

To explore how money moves across borders, check out Global Remittance Flows on the Voronoi app.