Judging from the unbiased mainstream liberal media, Hillary Clinton won the Democratic debate last night thanks to her "formidable" performance "combined with her intelligence." The puke-worthy gushfest from Slate.com can de read here, but is summarized best as follows:
The National Journal is a little more "balanced" -
And here's the critical moment - in our opinion...
"The first difference is I don't take money from big banks. I don't get personal speaking fees from Goldman Sachs," Sanders said.
Clinton and Sanders then tussled at length over Wall Street regulations.
"Goldman Sachs [was] recently fined $5 billion," he said. "Goldman Sachs has given this country two secretaries of Treasury — one on the Republicans, one on the Democrats."
He continued by addressing Clinton directly: "You've received over $600,000 in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs in one year. I find it very strange that a major financial institution that pays $5 billion in fines for breaking the laws, not one of their executives is prosecuted while kids who smoke marijuana get a jail sentence."
Which makes us wonder how the mainstream continues to suckle at the Clinton teet, when this data is exposed...
As we recentlty reported Hillary is now doing worse than in 2008 which explains the unbiased media's desperation to talk up her debate performance.