You are here

Iraq

Does The New York Times Want America In Iraq For One Hundred Years?

Does The New York Times Want America In Iraq For One Hundred Years?

Authored by Curt Mills via NationalInterest.org,

The headline of the New York Times piece was breathless: “Iran Dominates in Iraq After U.S. Handed the Country Over.” The content was only slightly less so:

“But after the United States’ abrupt withdrawal of troops in 2011, American constancy is still in question here - a broad failure of American foreign policy, with responsibility shared across three administrations.”

A Mainstream Dose Of Reality On Iraq

Authored by Jacob Hornberger via RonPaulLibertyReport.com,

Ever since the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, we have been hit with a multiplicity of bromides, myths, falsehoods, and deceptions by U.S. officials and the mainstream media.

“Saddam was coming to get us with his WMDs.”

 

“Mushroom clouds were going to start appearing over U.S. cities.”

 

“The troops in Iraq are defending our freedoms.”

 

"The troops are bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq.”

 

The Media Says The US Just Liberated Mosul: Here's What Really Happened

The Media Says The US Just Liberated Mosul: Here's What Really Happened

Authored by Darius Shahtahmasebi via TheAntiMedia.org,

The mainstream media appears to be celebrating ISIS’ recent defeat in Mosul, albeit with some reservations. The media is largely using the word “liberation,” which indicates the people of Mosul have been freed from a monstrous force by a friendly, benevolent one.

In reality, the “liberation” of Mosul paints a dark, horrifying picture of America’s foreign policy when one realizes how ISIS took hold of Mosul in the first place.

Pages