Scientists Find "Persuasive Evidence" Of Vote Hacking, Demand Clinton Recount In 3 States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a7e8/7a7e8b93a40e857e7ff79215c3e1f884a7ce4070" alt="Scientists Find "Persuasive Evidence" Of Vote Hacking, Demand Clinton Recount In 3 States Scientists Find "Persuasive Evidence" Of Vote Hacking, Demand Clinton Recount In 3 States"
Between the so-called 'Hursti Hack', questions over Soros-linked voting machines, some peculiarities in Texas, and the media furore over Trump's democracy-threatening questioning of the election outcome; it is perhaps ironic that, after being soundly beaten across the vast majority of counties in America, NY Mag reports, a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers are urging the Clinton campaign to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump after alledgedly finding "persuasive evidence" of vote hacking.