You are here

More U.S. Tech Companies are Adopting Unequal Dual-Class Voting Structures

Can I share this graphic?Yes. Visualizations are free to share and post in their original form across the web—even for publishers. Please link back to this page and attribute Visual Capitalist.

When do I need a license?Licenses are required for some commercial uses, translations, or layout modifications. You can even whitelabel our visualizations. Explore your options.

Interested in this piece?Click here to license this visualization.

▼ Use This Visualizationa.bg-showmore-plg-link:hover,a.bg-showmore-plg-link:active,a.bg-showmore-plg-link:focus{color:#0071bb;}

The Briefing

  • Dual-class structures give executives greater voting rights over public shareholders
  • U.S. tech companies have increasingly adopted this structure since the mid 2010s

 

More U.S. Tech Companies are Adopting Unequal Voting Structures

Shareholders of public companies often receive the right to vote on corporate policies like issuing dividends or initiating mergers.

Some companies opt for a dual-class share structure, where one class is offered to the public, and another is reserved for founders and executives. Many argue that this weakens accountability, as executives can simply overrule the wishes of outside investors.

The following table lists the number of U.S. companies that have IPO’d with a dual-class share structure. This data was compiled by Jay R. Ritter, Cordell Professor of Finance at the University of Florida.

Year Non-tech IPOs % of Dual Class
(non-tech)
Tech IPOs % of Dual Class
(tech)
1980 49 2% 22 0%
1981 120 3% 72 3%
1982 35 0% 42 0%
1983 278 1% 173 2%
1984 121 4% 50 4%
1985 149 4% 37 3%
1986 316 7% 77 4%
1987 226 10% 59 2%
1988 77 10% 28 14%
1989 81 6% 35 3%
1990 78 12% 32 0%
1991 215 8% 71 9%
1992 297 6% 115 4%
1993 383 8% 127 2%
1994 287 9% 115 6%
1995 257 9% 205 4%
1996 401 11% 276 5%
1997 300 13% 174 6%
1998 170 12% 113 7%
1999 106 18% 370 6%
2000 120 6% 260 7%
2001 57 11% 23 9%
2002 46 24% 20 5%
2003 45 11% 18 6%
2004 112 8% 61 5%
2005 115 11% 45 20%
2006 109 9% 48 2%
2007 83 16% 76 7%
2008 15 20% 6 0%
2009 27 11% 14 14%
2010 58 12% 33 6%
2011 45 18% 36 14%
2012 53 17% 40 15%
2013 113 20% 45 11%
2014 153 12% 53 6%
2015 80 10% 38 37%
2016 54 7% 21 24%
2017 76 22% 30 43%
2018 95 14% 39 36%
2019 75 16% 37 35%
2020 120 11% 45 42%
2021 193 24% 118 47%
2022 32 16% 6 50%

Includes IPOs on the NYSE American, NYSE, and Nasdaq Stock Market with an offer price of at least $5.00.

The biggest takeaway from this dataset is that dual-class structures have become much more prevalent among U.S. tech firms. Starting in the mid 2010s, this trend includes noteworthy IPOs such as Facebook (2012), Square (2015), Pinterest (2019), and Coinbase (2021).

In the case of Coinbase, a separate class of shares reserved for founders and insiders has 20 times the voting power of regular, publicly available shares. According to Fast Company, this gives insiders 53.5% of the overall votes.

How do Dual-Class Share Structures Impact Performance?

Ritter’s report also analyzed the three-year returns on 9,089 IPOs from 1980 to 2021. Once again, this only includes IPOs on the NYSE American, NYSE, and Nasdaq Stock Market with an offer price of at least $5.00.

Returns were calculated through the end of December 2021.

Category Share structure # of IPOs 3-Yr Buy-and-hold Return Market-adjusted Return
Tech Dual-class 295 41.0% 20.0%
Tech Single 3,009 19.6% -14.6%
Non-tech Dual-class 584 24.1% -12.7%
Non-tech Single 5,201 17.9% -23.9%

In both categories (tech or non-tech), IPOs with dual-class voting structures outperformed over the three year period. This outperformance was significantly higher for tech companies.

Where does this data come from?

Source: University of Florida (2023)

Data note: Buy-and-hold returns are calculated from the first close until the earlier of the three-year anniversary or the delisting date (the end December of 2022 for IPOs from 2020 and 2021). Market-adjusted returns are the difference between the asset’s return and the index’s return. The index in this case is the CRSP value-weighted index, which includes NYSE American, NYSE, and Nasdaq stocks.

The post More U.S. Tech Companies are Adopting Unequal Dual-Class Voting Structures appeared first on Visual Capitalist.