You are here

Visualized: What Cutting Canadian Aluminum Would Cost the U.S.

Published

12 mins ago

on

March 8, 2025

| 14 views

-->

By

Alan Kennedy

Graphics & Design

  • Alejandra Dander
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • Email

The following content is sponsored by Aluminum Association of Canada

Visualized: What Cutting Canadian Aluminum Would Cost the U.S.

Producing Canadian aluminum is energy-intensive. Creating a metric ton of this versatile material takes nearly 15,000 kilowatt hours–enough electricity to power a typical U.S. household for 16 months.

With the U.S. planning to place tariffs on metals coming from Canada and increase its efforts to start domestic production, we ask: what would the replacement of 2.7 million metric tons of Canadian aluminum mean for America’s energy consumption?

To answer this question, Visual Capitalist has partnered with the Aluminum Association of Canada to explore the potential cost of the U.S. abandoning aluminum imported from Canada.

A Critical Material

Aluminum’s versatility has made it essential in various industries. The U.S. consumes between 4 and 5 million metric tons annually, with a large portion sourced from Canada.

In 2024, the nation’s primary aluminum production totaled around 678,000 metric tons, the energy cost of which would have been around 10 million megawatt-hours—around the Hoover Dams’ annual electricity production.

However, the U.S. imported 2.7 million metric tons of Canadian aluminum in 2024. So, what would the energy needs be if the U.S. were to onshore all Canadian aluminum it imports?

If the U.S. were to onshore all 2.7 million metric tons of Canadian aluminum it imported in 2024, the energy requirement would skyrocket to over 40 million megawatt-hours of electricity. This is nearly four and a half times the annual electricity production of the Hoover Dam, enough to power 460 data centers or the entire state of Nevada for a year.

The Vital Place of Canadian Aluminum

Producing aluminum in Canada is simple for two vital reasons: infrastructure and energy.

Thanks to its world-class infrastructure and access to vast supplies of clean energy, Canada offers the U.S. a reliable, low-carbon source of aluminum.

Severing this relationship would not only mean massive financial and energy costs but also a significant setback in sustainability efforts, underlining the urgency of maintaining this partnership.

Related Topics: #canada #energy #aluminum #aluminium #tariffs #U.S. #aluminium association of canada #hoover dam

You may also like

  • Energy1 week ago

    Visualizing Chinese EV Market Share Overseas

    Chinese brands accounted for 62% of global EV sales in 2024.

  • Oil and Gas3 weeks ago

    Mapped: How Much Each Country Pays for Gas in 2025

    Production and refining costs, transportation and distribution fares, and taxes and subsidies all affect how much everyone pays for gas.

  • Mining1 month ago

    How Many New Mines Are Needed for the Energy Transition?

    Copper and lithium will require the highest number of new mines.

  • Energy2 months ago

    Where the U.S. Gets Its Enriched Uranium

    Russia controls nearly half of global uranium enrichment capacity.

  • Energy3 months ago

    Oil & Gas Leases on Public Lands Under Obama, Trump, and Biden

    President-elect Donald Trump wants a massive boost in U.S. oil production to reduce energy costs.

  • United States3 months ago

    Which State Has the Highest Gas Price in 2024?

    Oklahoma has the cheapest fuel, while Hawaii is the most expensive.

Subscribe

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Join the 375,000+ subscribers who receive our daily email *Sign Up

The post Visualized: What Cutting Canadian Aluminum Would Cost the U.S. appeared first on Visual Capitalist.