S&P

When BofA's Michael Hartnett releases his monthly Fund Managers' Survey, the one chart we always head straight to is the one showing what the "smart money" investors, aka those polled clients who make up the survey (and the same ones who we reported earlier have been selling this bear market rally for the past seven straight weeks) are most worried about, or as they put it: what are the biggest "tail risks."

A brief walk down memory lane. 

Three weeks ago, when looking at the incoming Q4 results, we were stunned by an unprecedented divergence: that of GAAP and non-GAAP earnings. We showed this difference as follows:

... and noted that while on a non-GAAP basis, the S&P's trailing P/E is a relatively rich 16.5x (over 17x as of today), it was the GAAP P/E that was troubling, because at just 91.5 in actual S&P EPS, this implies that the GAAP P/E of the overall market is now a near-record 22x.

We showed the delta between GAAP and non-GAAP as follows:

Remember Rachel Fox? For those who do not, here is a reminder courtesy of this blast from the February 2013 past interview of the then-16 year old Desperate Housewives "TV star" who became a "star trader" using her acting money, and after returning 30% in 2012 and outperforming 99% of hedge funds, was promptly interviewed by CNBC, unleashing the whole "17 year old hedge fund manager" meme:

Forget Ackman, Einhorn, Bass, And Hendry. There is only one name in the world of equity market performance in 2012 - Rachel Fox, of 'Desperate Housewives' fame.

Last week it was all about the ECB, which disappointed on hopes of further rate cuts (leading to the Thursday selloff) but delivered on the delayed realization that the ECB is now greenlighting a tsunami in buybacks (leading to the Friday market surge). This week it is once again all about central banks, only this time instead of stimulus, the risk is to the downside, with the BOJ expected to do nothing at all after the January NIRP fiasco, while the "data dependent" Fed will - if anything - hint at further hawkishness now that the S&P is back over 2,000.

When we last looked at the $2.9 billion Horseman Capital, we reported that not only has the fund which many have called the "most bearish in the world" generated tremendous returns almost every single year since inception (except for a 25% drop in 2009 after returning 31% during the cataclysmic 2008), but more notably, it has achieved that return while been net short - and quite bearish on - stocks ever since 2012.