Charted: The Costs of Mining Silver vs. Gold

Published

6 mins ago

April 25, 2025

| 763 views

-->

Ryan Bellefontaine

Graphics & Design

Athul Alexander

The following content is sponsored by Vizsla Silver Corp.

Charted: The Costs of Mining Silver vs. Gold

Key Takeaways

Extracting one ton of gold requires 20,000 MWh of energy, compared to just 250 MWh for silver.
Each ton of gold produces 9,000 tons of CO₂, while silver mining produces only 125 tons.
Mining an ounce of gold costs approximately $1,388, compared to $27 per ounce of silver.

At first glance, gold’s higher price per ounce makes it seem like the obvious choice for miners. However, a closer look at production costs and environmental impact reveals why silver remains such an attractive metal to extract.

This graphic, sponsored by Vizsla Silver Corp., uses data from Thunder Said Energy, AG Metals, and Metals Focus Gold Mine Cost Service to compare the costs of mining silver vs. gold.

The Energy and Emissions Footprint

Gold mining is not only significantly more energy-intensive than silver mining but also produces many more emissions because of the increased energy intensity.

Mining Metric	Silver	Gold
Energy Intensity (MWh/ton of metal)	250	20,000
Emissions Intensity (tons of CO2/ton of metal)	125	9,000
Production Cost ($/ounce of metal)	27	1,388

Extracting one ton of gold requires 20,000 MWh of energy, compared to just 250 MWh for silver—an 80-fold difference. This vast energy demand translates into emissions: each ton of gold produces 9,000 tons of CO₂, while silver mining produces only 125 tons.

This stark contrast in energy and emissions highlights a key challenge in the gold industry. Despite its high market value, the environmental cost of gold extraction is dramatically higher than that of silver.

Production Costs: Bang for the Buck

The financial aspect further supports silver’s appeal. Mining an ounce of gold costs approximately $1,388, compared to $27 per ounce of silver. This means gold is 51 times more expensive to extract than silver when using the all-in-sustaining costs metric.

While gold prices are significantly higher, silver’s lower production costs indicate a more efficient return on investment.

Silver is a compelling alternative to gold when considering both environmental and financial factors. While gold is valued much higher, silver offers a more sustainable and cost-effective approach to mining.

Discover how Vizsla Silver Corp. promotes responsible mining practices to support the rising global demand for silver while building a sustainable future.

I’m Ready to Invest in Vizsla Silver Corp.

Related Topics: #mining #silver #gold #commodities #industry #investments #emissions #Vizsla Silver Corp.

Click for Comments

var disqus_shortname = "visualcapitalist.disqus.com";
var disqus_title = "Charted: The Costs of Mining Silver vs. Gold";
var disqus_url = "https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/the-costs-of-mining-silver-vs-gold/";
var disqus_identifier = "visualcapitalist.disqus.com-176838";

Charted: Where the U.S. Imports Its Art From Guest
Charted: The Costs of Mining Silver vs. Gold Guest
Visualizing AI vs. Human Performance in Technical Tasks Guest
Mapped: Countries Where People Don’t Exercise Enough Guest
The Ultimate Visual Breakdown of the AI Index Report 2025 (VC+) Guest
Ranked: Top Countries by Stock Market Returns Since 2015 Guest
Charted: The Surging Cost of Training AI Models Guest
U.S. Latino GDP vs. Global Economic Powers Guest
Charted: Battery Capacity by Country (2024-2030) Guest
Mapped: Daycare Costs by State Guest

You are here

Charted: The Costs of Mining Silver vs. Gold