There was much speculation toward the end of Donald Trump’s term as president of the United States that Trump would pardon Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, or both of these men who were responsible for exposing vast amounts of wrongdoing by the US government. But, it did not come to pass. Why?
The United States government’s lead coronavirus fearmonger and experimental coronavirus “vaccine” shots pusher Anthony Fauci was in his usual throw the facts overboard propagandist mode in a Friday CNBC interview.Fear the omicron, says Fauci in the interview. Yet, this latest coronavirus variant du jour seems to be much less of a threat than the original coronavirus that was hyped to justify massive violations of liberty.Take booster injections of the experimental coronavirus vaccine shots, Fauci next advises.
Russia’s Humanity and Moral Conscience Are Leading to War
Paul Craig Roberts
It speaks to the humanity and moral greatness of the Russian government led by Vladimir Putin that Russia consented to a pretend attack in order that Donald Trump could save face. Unfortunately for us all, the consequences of Russia’s generosity will not be the thanks that the Russians deserve. Russia and Putin will get no credit for saving Trump from having to back down or have his naval flotilla sunk and his bombers shot down.
Are We Over the US/UK Fomented Crisis In Syria?
Paul Craig Roberts
It appears from the very limited US missile attack, most of which were intercepted and destroyed by Syrian air defenses, that the US military prevailed over the crazed John Bolton and carefully avoided a strike that would have resulted in a Russian response. No significant Syrian site appears to have been targeted, and no Russians were endangered. https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/04/in-depth-syria-stuns-world-thwarts-us-attack/
American Officials Continue to Make Laughing Stocks of Themselves
Paul Craig Roberts
Here is “Mad Dog” Mattis, the US Secretary of War, stating that he has no evidence that there was a chemical weapons attack in Syria last week, but that he personally believes that there was one.
I remember when a person who claimed to believe something for which there was no evidence was either a religious fanatic or an ideologue. No serious person would express a conviction when there was no evidence to support it.